Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Defraggler, has been updated
ɹəuəllıʍ ʇɐb
post Aug 19 2008, 06:43
Post #1
ドラえもん
Group Icon
Group: WF Support
Posts: 7,997
Joined: 21-October 04
From: Tōkyō
Member No.: 1,524


Attached File  defraggler.gif ( 5.8K ) Number of downloads: 1


Defraggler v1.02.085 Final
  • Improved progress indicator accuracy.
  • Added checks for freespace.
  • Various GUI and usability improvements.
  • Fixed UI issues with large DPI settings.
  • Fixed 64-bit compatibility issue that would ignore some files.
  • Improved drive map (defragged files are now always marked as blue).
  • Added background update checking.
  • Fixed minor bug in progress indicator for chkdsk.
  • Minor bug fixes.
http://www.defraggler.com/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

D4\/!d
post Aug 19 2008, 11:44
Post #2
Advanced Member
****
Group: WF Member
Posts: 962
Joined: 1-April 04
From: South West London
Member No.: 886


Defraggler v1.02.085 Final is wonderful.
I much prefer it over any of the many other defrag tools I have used.
For one thing I can defrag individual files, which is one feature I require.
It's Defraggler for me now on.
Highly Recommended.

This post has been edited by D4\/!d: Aug 19 2008, 11:45


--------------------
Caesar adsum jam forte. Brutus aderat. Caesar sic in omnibus. Brutus sic inat.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

D4\/!d
post Aug 19 2008, 18:43
Post #3
Advanced Member
****
Group: WF Member
Posts: 962
Joined: 1-April 04
From: South West London
Member No.: 886


QUOTE (D4\/!d @ Aug 19 2008, 12:44) *
For one thing I can defrag individual files, which is one feature I require.
QUOTE
Defrag Individual Files
Most defragmentation tools only let you defrag the whole drive. Defraggler gives you the power to select individual files and folders to defrag. So you can get the job done in seconds, rather than waiting for the whole drive to complete. Of course if you want to defrag the whole drive Defraggler will let you do that too.
Features

As it says on the tin, it does it in seconds. Well, it does for me. cool.gif


--------------------
Caesar adsum jam forte. Brutus aderat. Caesar sic in omnibus. Brutus sic inat.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

andsome
post Aug 20 2008, 06:36
Post #4
Head windows forum chef
Group Icon
Group: WF Subscriber
Posts: 31,363
Joined: 31-December 02
From: Burntwood, Staffordshire
Member No.: 77


QUOTE (D4\/!d @ Aug 19 2008, 19:43) *
QUOTE (D4\/!d @ Aug 19 2008, 12:44) *
For one thing I can defrag individual files, which is one feature I require.
QUOTE
Defrag Individual Files
Most defragmentation tools only let you defrag the whole drive. Defraggler gives you the power to select individual files and folders to defrag. So you can get the job done in seconds, rather than waiting for the whole drive to complete. Of course if you want to defrag the whole drive Defraggler will let you do that too.
Features

As it says on the tin, it does it in seconds. Well, it does for me. cool.gif



Will it defrag the WHOLE drive in seconds? I will set it running again and time it for a 160GB drive while still using the computer. biggrin.gif


--------------------




Gustav Mahler was the worlds finest composer, EVER
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

andsome
post Aug 20 2008, 07:08
Post #5
Head windows forum chef
Group Icon
Group: WF Subscriber
Posts: 31,363
Joined: 31-December 02
From: Burntwood, Staffordshire
Member No.: 77


It took 24 minutes, a lot longer than Diskeeper. Also bear in mind that the drive was defragged yesterday before I closed down. biggrin.gif

I will leave it on the computer for now and give it a few more tries. I will almost certainly then uninstall it. I would not like to be without the boot time defrag in Diskeeper. It really does make a noticeable difference to the speed of operation of the computer.


--------------------




Gustav Mahler was the worlds finest composer, EVER
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

andsome
post Apr 15 2009, 07:27
Post #6
Head windows forum chef
Group Icon
Group: WF Subscriber
Posts: 31,363
Joined: 31-December 02
From: Burntwood, Staffordshire
Member No.: 77


I got rid of it and went back to Diskeeper. Definitely the very best. biggrin.gif


--------------------




Gustav Mahler was the worlds finest composer, EVER
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

-pops-
post Aug 24 2009, 14:37
Post #7
WF Moderator
Group Icon
Group: WF Support
Posts: 10,483
Joined: 7-October 03
From: Surrey/Sussex/Hants borders
Member No.: 518


Useless - worse than!

I recently bought a laptop machine (my first). Having finsished loading most of the stuff I want on to it, I tried Defraggler.

At the start:

17 fragmented files = 21.5GB
73 total fragments
44% Fragmentation
48.6GB used space

At the end::

5 fragmented files = 21.5GB
67 total fragments
43% Fragmentation
50.3GB used space

What has it done for me? Well consolidated 17 files into 5 with no change in total size. Lost 1% of fragments only and lost 1.7GB of hard drive space - all in the time of 85 minutes.

Huh!


--------------------
(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(")
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Boris
post Aug 24 2009, 15:00
Post #8
Iconoclast
Group Icon
Group: WF Support
Posts: 6,120
Joined: 24-December 02
From: Twixt Severn and Wye
Member No.: 16


-pops-

I would hazard a guess from your resuts that the new laptop is a Vista machine ?

System restore points, especially in Vista, continue to take snapshots, even while you are defragging (part of Volume Shadow Copy), so I believe that the big unchanged files remain because you have not turned off Volume Shadow Copy ?

See this thread :-http://forum.piriform.com/index.php?showtopic=16464

+ have a read through this :-
http://www.howtohaven.com/system/turn-off-...opy-vista.shtml

Defraggler seems to work fine with every O/S that I have tried including Windows 7RC (after a bit of "tweaking" smile.gif )


--------------------
"Universally challenged ! "
"64k ought to be enough for anybody" - Bill Gates (1981)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

-pops-
post Aug 24 2009, 15:10
Post #9
WF Moderator
Group Icon
Group: WF Support
Posts: 10,483
Joined: 7-October 03
From: Surrey/Sussex/Hants borders
Member No.: 518


Yes, it is a Vista machine.

I still feel Defraggler a load of rubbish. if it requires things to be turned off, it should tell you that.

Even considering that, it still consumed drive space.

I've just run Windows defragmenter and have 40GB used space which is more like I anticipated.


--------------------
(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(")
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

andsome
post Aug 24 2009, 15:13
Post #10
Head windows forum chef
Group Icon
Group: WF Subscriber
Posts: 31,363
Joined: 31-December 02
From: Burntwood, Staffordshire
Member No.: 77


I tried Defraggler some time ago on XP, and ran Diskeeper afterwards. Before running Diskeeper I analysed the drive after using Defraggler, and Defraggler had hardly made any difference. I will stick with Diskeeper thanks. biggrin.gif


--------------------




Gustav Mahler was the worlds finest composer, EVER
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

ɹəuəllıʍ ʇɐb
post Nov 5 2009, 03:14
Post #11
ドラえもん
Group Icon
Group: WF Support
Posts: 7,997
Joined: 21-October 04
From: Tōkyō
Member No.: 1,524


Defraggler v1.15.163
QUOTE
In release 1.15 of Defraggler, we've focused on Windows 7 support and improving the user interface.

User interface - The most obvious change is the improved appearance of the pie chart from a standard windows one into a cooler transparent one. We hope you like it!

Windows 7
- Released on October 22, and Defraggler has full support! We've got new internal optimizations that will improve your system optimization experience on this new OS!

  • Redesigned disk space usage pie chart.
  • Windows 7 support added.
  • Added Portable U3 installer support.
  • Improved numerical and text validation.
  • Fixed bug in automatic update checking.
  • Many GUI fixes and improvements.

http://www.defraggler.com/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 21st November 2009 - 00:58