Windows Forum - Computer Support Forums: Defraggler - Windows Forum - Computer Support Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Defraggler has been updated

#1 User is offline   ɹəuəllıʍ ʇɐb 

  • ドラえもん
  • View gallery
  • Group: WF Moderator
  • Posts: 8,769
  • Joined: 21-October 04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tōkyō

Posted 19 August 2008 - 06:43

Attached File  defraggler.gif (5.8K)
Number of downloads: 1

Defraggler v1.02.085 Final
  • Improved progress indicator accuracy.
  • Added checks for freespace.
  • Various GUI and usability improvements.
  • Fixed UI issues with large DPI settings.
  • Fixed 64-bit compatibility issue that would ignore some files.
  • Improved drive map (defragged files are now always marked as blue).
  • Added background update checking.
  • Fixed minor bug in progress indicator for chkdsk.
  • Minor bug fixes.
http://www.defraggler.com/
0

#2 User is offline   D4\/!d 

  • Advanced
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: WF Member
  • Posts: 1,036
  • Joined: 01-April 04
  • Location:sarfwest London

Posted 19 August 2008 - 11:44

Defraggler v1.02.085 Final is wonderful.
I much prefer it over any of the many other defrag tools I have used.
For one thing I can defrag individual files, which is one feature I require.
It's Defraggler for me now on.
Highly Recommended.

This post has been edited by D4\/!d: 19 August 2008 - 11:45

Caesar adsum jam forte. Brutus aderat. Caesar sic in omnibus. Brutus sic inat.
0

#3 User is offline   D4\/!d 

  • Advanced
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: WF Member
  • Posts: 1,036
  • Joined: 01-April 04
  • Location:sarfwest London

Posted 19 August 2008 - 18:43

View PostD4\/!d, on Aug 19 2008, 12:44, said:

For one thing I can defrag individual files, which is one feature I require.

Quote

Defrag Individual Files
Most defragmentation tools only let you defrag the whole drive. Defraggler gives you the power to select individual files and folders to defrag. So you can get the job done in seconds, rather than waiting for the whole drive to complete. Of course if you want to defrag the whole drive Defraggler will let you do that too.
Features

As it says on the tin, it does it in seconds. Well, it does for me. B)
Caesar adsum jam forte. Brutus aderat. Caesar sic in omnibus. Brutus sic inat.
0

#4 User is offline   andsome 

  • Head windows forum chef
  • View gallery
  • Group: WF Subscriber
  • Posts: 32,721
  • Joined: 31-December 02
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Burntwood, Staffordshire

Posted 20 August 2008 - 06:36

View PostD4\/!d, on Aug 19 2008, 19:43, said:

View PostD4\/!d, on Aug 19 2008, 12:44, said:

For one thing I can defrag individual files, which is one feature I require.

Quote

Defrag Individual Files
Most defragmentation tools only let you defrag the whole drive. Defraggler gives you the power to select individual files and folders to defrag. So you can get the job done in seconds, rather than waiting for the whole drive to complete. Of course if you want to defrag the whole drive Defraggler will let you do that too.
Features

As it says on the tin, it does it in seconds. Well, it does for me. B)



Will it defrag the WHOLE drive in seconds? I will set it running again and time it for a 160GB drive while still using the computer. :D
Posted Image
Posted Image


Gustav Mahler was the worlds finest composer, EVER
0

#5 User is offline   andsome 

  • Head windows forum chef
  • View gallery
  • Group: WF Subscriber
  • Posts: 32,721
  • Joined: 31-December 02
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Burntwood, Staffordshire

Posted 20 August 2008 - 07:08

It took 24 minutes, a lot longer than Diskeeper. Also bear in mind that the drive was defragged yesterday before I closed down. :D

I will leave it on the computer for now and give it a few more tries. I will almost certainly then uninstall it. I would not like to be without the boot time defrag in Diskeeper. It really does make a noticeable difference to the speed of operation of the computer.
Posted Image
Posted Image


Gustav Mahler was the worlds finest composer, EVER
0

#6 User is offline   andsome 

  • Head windows forum chef
  • View gallery
  • Group: WF Subscriber
  • Posts: 32,721
  • Joined: 31-December 02
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Burntwood, Staffordshire

Posted 15 April 2009 - 07:27

I got rid of it and went back to Diskeeper. Definitely the very best. :D
Posted Image
Posted Image


Gustav Mahler was the worlds finest composer, EVER
0

#7 User is offline   -pops- 

  • WF Moderator
  • Group: WF Moderator
  • Posts: 11,221
  • Joined: 07-October 03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Surrey/Sussex/Hants borders

Posted 24 August 2009 - 14:37

Useless - worse than!

I recently bought a laptop machine (my first). Having finsished loading most of the stuff I want on to it, I tried Defraggler.

At the start:

17 fragmented files = 21.5GB
73 total fragments
44% Fragmentation
48.6GB used space

At the end::

5 fragmented files = 21.5GB
67 total fragments
43% Fragmentation
50.3GB used space

What has it done for me? Well consolidated 17 files into 5 with no change in total size. Lost 1% of fragments only and lost 1.7GB of hard drive space - all in the time of 85 minutes.

Huh!
(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(")
0

#8 User is offline   Boris 

  • Iconoclast
  • View gallery
  • Group: WF Moderator
  • Posts: 6,501
  • Joined: 24-December 02
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Twixt Severn and Wye

Posted 24 August 2009 - 15:00

-pops-

I would hazard a guess from your resuts that the new laptop is a Vista machine ?

System restore points, especially in Vista, continue to take snapshots, even while you are defragging (part of Volume Shadow Copy), so I believe that the big unchanged files remain because you have not turned off Volume Shadow Copy ?

See this thread :-http://forum.piriform.com/index.php?showtopic=16464

+ have a read through this :-
http://www.howtohaven.com/system/turn-off-...opy-vista.shtml

Defraggler seems to work fine with every O/S that I have tried including Windows 7RC (after a bit of "tweaking" :) )
Posted Image"Universally challenged ! " Posted Image
"64k ought to be enough for anybody" - Bill Gates (1981)
Posted Image
0

#9 User is offline   -pops- 

  • WF Moderator
  • Group: WF Moderator
  • Posts: 11,221
  • Joined: 07-October 03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Surrey/Sussex/Hants borders

Posted 24 August 2009 - 15:10

Yes, it is a Vista machine.

I still feel Defraggler a load of rubbish. if it requires things to be turned off, it should tell you that.

Even considering that, it still consumed drive space.

I've just run Windows defragmenter and have 40GB used space which is more like I anticipated.
(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(")
0

#10 User is offline   andsome 

  • Head windows forum chef
  • View gallery
  • Group: WF Subscriber
  • Posts: 32,721
  • Joined: 31-December 02
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Burntwood, Staffordshire

Posted 24 August 2009 - 15:13

I tried Defraggler some time ago on XP, and ran Diskeeper afterwards. Before running Diskeeper I analysed the drive after using Defraggler, and Defraggler had hardly made any difference. I will stick with Diskeeper thanks. :D
Posted Image
Posted Image


Gustav Mahler was the worlds finest composer, EVER
0

#11 User is offline   ɹəuəllıʍ ʇɐb 

  • ドラえもん
  • View gallery
  • Group: WF Moderator
  • Posts: 8,769
  • Joined: 21-October 04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tōkyō

Posted 22 June 2010 - 08:40

Quote

Every piece of software needs regular updates to optimize it, improve on its features, and fix bugs as they arise. Defraggler v1.20 is an essential update, though it does not introduce any visible new features.

Here's the change log:
  • Improved drive map updating.
  • Improved 64-bit memory addressing.
  • Improved Quick Defrag file algorithms.
  • Improved handling of Windows styles.
  • Fixed bug with MFT buffer zone.
  • Added prompt on exit when long tasks are running.
  • Many improvements to UI when using non-English.
  • Added Georgian translation.
  • Minor stability fixes.


Download - Installer, Portable, PortableU3 & Slim builds

http://www.piriform.com/defraggler
0

#12 User is offline   D4\/!d 

  • Advanced
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: WF Member
  • Posts: 1,036
  • Joined: 01-April 04
  • Location:sarfwest London

Posted 22 June 2010 - 11:22

Ta.
I still use it - with Win7x64
Caesar adsum jam forte. Brutus aderat. Caesar sic in omnibus. Brutus sic inat.
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users